Wednesday, October 9, 2019

World War Z (Max Brooks)


World War Z (Max Brooks)
I’m not going to say this was a bad book, but I don’t think it was a good example of a horror novel. There was a monster type present, and it was zombies. Similar to I am Legend, which had vampires that came about due to a virus, the zombies in World War Z came about by a sickness. In many ways, these zombies were like the vampires too. So much so, that I don’t really think there is much of a distinction. They both “pro-created” exponentially by infecting their victims. Some of the vampires could talk, none of the zombies could, but neither had the capacity for actual thinking. There was a second type of vampire in I am Legend that did form a society, but they were only involved in the ending of that book. Regarding the actual zombie monster of this book, I felt like we’ve already been there, seen that.

But it wasn’t a horror novel. Brooks went into incredible detail with the geopolitical representation of the world. He definitely put a lot of research into the governments and diplomatic relationships of countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan, China and Taiwan (and its ambiguous status), Cuba, Russia, and Israel and the Palestinians. The book was really about how countries might respond to an epidemic like these diseased zombies more than it was about zombies. Isolationism and long-standing political tensions were what this book was about, and I never felt like I was reading a horror book. Sure, zombies were in the book, but Nazi concentration camps were also terrible. You wouldn’t classify a book about them as “horror,” though they were plenty horrible. This book felt like reading about something like that.

The journalistic approach of having multiple “survivors” give interviews was the other main factor that, for me, made this book anything but a horror novel. Everyone was telling the reporter their stories, and the problem with that is that you already know every one of them survived. There was zero tension in the book for me. There were a few scenes that described goriness, but I don’t think that is the definition of horror.

I was impressed with some of the things Brooks knew and put into this book. For instance, he knew the nickname for the B-52 as a BUFF, though the true breakout of the acronym is Big Ugly Fat Fucker. Fat Fellow was only used in situations where swearing would be frowned upon. I’d have thought in a book like this, the true breakout would have been more appropriate. But hey, like I said, I was impressed he got it in his book at all. His military terminology was very good. I think he did a lot of serious research for this book that showed. However, I found it hard to believe the story of the female pilot who parachuted down to the Louisiana swamps. Fighter pilots, which she was initially, don’t wear parachutes, but they have ejection seats that include parachutes. However, cargo aircrews on prop cargo planes, which is what she was when the plane accident happened, do not wear parachutes as part of their job. Maybe they “changed the rules” after the zombies or something, but if so, he should have called that out. It’s just not normal for an aircrew of a heavy (the term used to describe the large military planes like transports, recon, command and control, and tankers) to wear parachutes. Many heavy aircrews don’t even have parachutes. And then she also apparently wore a survival kit that included an electronic GPS, a radio, and a hammock, among other things. She had to have been wearing it, because she had just relieved herself in the piss tube when the back end of the plane broke off and she was sucked out the back. Wasn’t like she grabbed this stuff on the way out. I can’t even envision what she looked like relieving herself with all this supposed stuff on. Comical. So, what Brooks is implying is that these pilots wear parachutes and survival kits with all this equipment, at all times, in the course of their duties. That’s not the way it works. The plane will have an inflatable emergency raft or two, and bound up with those quickly deployable rafts would be survival kits that contain things like radios, water, compasses, desalination kits, and... well… no hammocks… but whatever. My point is that you don’t wear all this stuff. It would be impossible. I know I’m not really talking about the monsters here, just nitpicking the military stuff, but the book wasn’t really about monsters either.

Not a bad book, but I just didn’t feel like it was horror genre. More like a what-if scenario involving a plague and how countries would react to it.

I do have to give one major shout out to Brooks for including the metal band Iron Maiden and the song The Trooper in this book. Second best rock band of all time and one hell of a song. Bravo, Mr. Brooks.

4 comments:

  1. I really enjoyed the interview style layout. It did seem a bit jumbled and confusing at first; however, it grew on me fast once the survivors started telling their stories. I also enjoyed how each chapter/interview was someone different instead of telling on whole survivor's story then on to the next. I think the interviews in between each story created very decent suspense. I also really loved the Japan interview with the guy climbing down apartment deck-things. I felt like I was right there with him, especially when the one zombie was OC (out of control) following him.

    While a lot of people did survive based off the amount of interviews, we got to witness those around them die or transform through their stories. I think that was tension enough. It put you in survival mode, almost by flashbacks, just as effectively as it could have done had we followed one character while in the situation. We see how all these people from various parts of the world fought or fled to save themselves while others were not so fortunate.

    I am not familiar with military terminology. Closest I am to that is my cousin, who I have not spoken to in two years, just finished a tour in Afghanistan. So, I really enjoyed reading your paragraph on that and furthering my thoughts. I enjoyed seeing things from that perspective because every mind has something to offer another.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The biggest thing for me regarding tension is not knowing outcome. And the biggest tension would be not knowing if the protagonist or other main character that I like is going to die. In a horror novel, I feel like that should be my biggest concern. The interview style of this book nullified all of that. There was good description of the zombies and people losing it, but it was all eye-witness reporting. You didn't get attached to anyone who died... they were all just part of a survivor's story. I got zero tension out of the book, and that was why it was a dud for me. I honestly couldn't wait to get through it.

    The movie, to me, was much better. But it did exactly what you said you didn't want--followed one character through from start to finish. There was no interview or survivor story aspect to it, so you didn't know if the character was going to die or not. I liked the movie. It still had a little bit of the international flavor to it. I believe the character went to Korea, I guess implying it started there instead of China. He also went to Israel, and it did have the part that was in the book about how they had taken precautions before the zombies hit. That was cool. But, given the way you follow the one character and don't know if he is going to make it or not, I'd have to say that based on that alone, it really is a different story. Lots of tension.

    Props to your cousin in Afghanistan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Those are excellent comments regarding the military detail ala Clancy and that may have been another reason why I did not dig this book, it almost felt like another genre other than horror. I like mash-ups but this one did not work for me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You make a really good point about the stakes in the novel being lowered because we know all the characters giving interviews survive to the end. It's funny that that detail never occurred to me as I was reading—I loved the book and actually found it more exciting than any of the others we've read so far. I'm trying to think why that might be, since Brooks' zombies frightened me more than even the widows or Rawhead... it might honestly just be that I love Brooks' writing style. In the span of a few sentences, each anecdote sucked me in to the point that I forgot I was hearing about it so long after the fact!

    ReplyDelete